This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
The definition given relies on an online etymological dictionary and is at odds with the mention of Bergman’s use of colour to represent ‘the human soul’. So to limit it to images “that look like a person or thing” overlooks the representation of abstract concepts. Since almost no references are provided, the article consists of sweeping, unsupported statements and has no authority. Mental image is an article which conveys some of the complexity which should be dealt with here, and points to some of the references that might be used, though even that merely scratches the surface. What does one learn in reading this article? Jamesmcardle(talk)23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this -- it seems that this article is trying to describe several different concepts under the same umbrella (e.g. conflating the physical/digital reproduction of images with the concept of a mental image), resulting in a wordy mess. ARoseThorn (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I edited this article per the GOCE backlog drive, but I'm not sure if what I have contributed is adequate enough to count towards the drive. I've removed the copy edit tag, but it seems like someone needs to do a top-down rework with the article - finding sources, citing claims, beautification, etc. I find this to be out of the scope of the drive, but please let me know your opinion on the matter of tag removal. (Hope I didn't open a can of worms here!) BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
